Abstract
The diagnosis of breast lesions is usually confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or histological biopsy. Although there is increasing literature regarding the advantages and limitations of both modalities, there is no literature regarding the accuracy of these modalities for diagnosing breast lesions in high-risk patients, who usually have lesions detected by screening. The objective of the current study was to evaluate diagnostic performance indices of FNAC in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers.
BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers who underwent FNAC were selected from the database of the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. FNAC accuracy parameters were calculated by taking the outcome of a subsequent histological diagnosis or clinical follow-up as reference standard.
In total, 320 FNACs were obtained, and FNAC examination was followed by histological examination in 150 patients. The rate of insufficient material was 25.6%. Sensitivity was 92.3%, specificity 96.3%. The false-positive rate was 3.7%, the false-negative rate was 7.7%, and accuracy was 94.7%. A substantial proportion of patients (35%) with malignant FNAC results underwent histological biopsy upfront surgical resection. Small lesion size (≤ 1 cm) and nonpalpability of the breast lesion were associated with decreased FNAC accuracy. In 113 patients who had a benign FNAC outcome without histological follow-up, no malignancies were detected during clinical or radiologic surveillance (median follow-up 84 months).
There is a role for FNAC in diagnosing breast lesions of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers, ie, to confirm a radiological (probably) benign lesion. However, despite the high overall sensitivity of FNAC, the authors recommend histological biopsy as the preferred diagnostic method for high-risk patients who have small or nonpalpable lesions.
摘要
乳腺病变通常可以通过细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)或组织学活检来确诊。虽然有越来越多关于这两种方法优势和局限性的文献,但是并没有关于这两种方法在乳腺癌高危人群、也就是那些经筛查而查出有病变人群中准确性的文献报道。本研究的目的是评估FNAC在乳腺癌易感基因(BRCA)突变携带者中的诊断效果。
进行FNAC的BRCA1/BRCA2基因突变携带者是从鹿特丹港市家族癌症诊所数据库中选择的。FNAC的准确性是以随后的组织学诊断结果或临床随访作为参考标准。
我们一共获得了320份FNAC结果,其中150个病人随后进行了组织学检查。
穿刺组织不足以诊断为25.6%。诊断敏感性为92.3%,特异性96.3%。假阳性率为3.7%,假阴性率为7.7%,准确度为94.7%。很大比例的FNAC为恶性的患者(35%)在进行手术切除前做了组织学活检。对于小病灶(≤1厘米)和临床触诊阴性的乳腺病变,FNAC的准确度有所下降。113个FNAC结果良性且没有组织学活检的患者,临床或放射检查均未发现恶性肿瘤(中位随访时间为84个月)。
FNAC对于诊断BRCA1/BRCA2突变携带者乳腺病变是有作用的,如证实放射性检查中的(可能为)良性病变。然而,尽管FNAC整体灵敏度高,但是对于乳腺小病灶或者临床触诊阴性的高危患者我们还是推荐将组织学活检作为首选诊断方法。
共0条评论