首页 > 期刊杂志 > 正文

Radiologically Undetected Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: An Immunohistochemical Correlation With LI-RADS Score.

肝移植术前影像学未发现的肝细胞肝癌:免疫组织化学与LI-RADS积分相关性分析

Xiong W,Cheeney G,Kim S,Kolesnikova V,Henninger B,Alexander J,Swanson PE,Upton MP,Truong CD,Yeh MM

Abstract

Orthotopic liver transplantation is the best option for patients with carefully selected unresectable disease because of underlying liver dysfunction. The 5-year survival rate after orthotopic liver transplantation for early detected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is high, and a similar or even higher rate is reported in those with radiologically undetected HCC. This study evaluated and compared the histologic features of pretransplant radiologically undetected (14 patients, 25 tumors) versus detected (36 patients, 45 tumors) HCCs. Tumor size, tumor differentiation, number of unpaired arteries, mitotic count per 10 high-power fields, CD34 immunostain to assess microvessel density, and Ki67 immunostain were compared with the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System score, which was retrospectively assigned to each tumor in both groups. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System score was significantly higher in the HCC detected group (P<0.001). The vast majority of the undetected HCCs (88%) was <2 cm in size. Only 12% of the undetected HCCs were ≥2 cm, whereas 51% of the detected HCCs were ≥2 cm in size. Higher rate of moderate to poor tumor differentiation was noted in the detected HCCs compared with the undetected group (89% vs. 60%; P=0.004). No statistically significant difference in the number and distribution of unpaired arteries, or mitotic count was observed in 2 groups (although fewer unpaired arteries were identified in the undetected group). The detected HCCs had a higher rate of 2+ CD34 staining compared with the undetected HCCs (68% vs. 27%; P=0.002), whereas the opposite was observed for 1+ CD34 staining (59% undetected HCCs vs. 17% detected HCCs; P=0.002). Ki67 proliferative index was not statistically different between the 2 groups (120.8/1000 cells detected HCCs vs. 81.8/1000 cells undetected HCCs; P=0.36). The factors associated with failing to detect HCCs pretransplant by radiologic studies include small tumor size (<2 cm), low-grade histologic differentiation, and low microvessel density (low CD34 staining). A significant association between the number and distribution of unpaired arteries and HCC detection has not been established by our study.

摘要

对于因肝功能紊乱不能进行手术切除的肝癌患者,原位肝移植是最好的治疗选择。早期发现的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者移植术后有很高的5年生存率,据报道在那些影像学没有发现肝细胞癌的患者中移植术后有相似、甚至更高的生存率。本研究评估并比较了移植前影像学未发现病灶(14例患者,25例肿瘤)与发现病灶(36例,45例肿瘤)的肝细胞癌组织学特征。对肿瘤大小、肿瘤分化程度、未配对动脉数目、每10个高倍视野下肿瘤细胞有丝分裂计数、评估微血管密度的CD34免疫染色及Ki67免疫染色与肝成像报告和数据系统(Li-Rads)评分进行比较,回顾性收集两组每个肿瘤病灶的这些信息。影像学发现病灶组中,Li-Rads积分显著提高(P小于0.001)。绝大多数影像学未发现病灶的HCCs(88%)直径小于2厘米。在未发现病灶组的HCCs中,只有12%直径大于2厘米,而发现病灶组的HCCs 51%直径大于2厘米。与影像学未发现病灶组的HCCs相比,发现病灶组hccs有更多属于中度分化到低分化 (89%60%;P = 0.004)。两组HCCs在未配对动脉的数量和分布及有丝分裂计数上未发现显著的统计学差异(尽管未发现病灶组中未配对的动脉较少)。与影像学未发现病灶组的HCCs相比,发现病灶的hcc有更高的2+CD34染色率(68%27%;P=0.002),而2组比较,1+CD34染色率则相反(未发现病灶组59%和发现病灶组17%;P = 0.002)Ki67增殖指数在2组比较中并没有统计学上的差异 (发现病灶组120.8/1000个细胞和未发现病灶组81.8/1000个细胞;P = 0.36)。分析表明,肿瘤直径较小(小于2cm)、组织学低分化程度,及低微血管分布密度(低CD34染色率)与移植前影像学发现病灶失败相关,而没有确定未配对动脉的数量和分布与其相关。

full text

我要评论

0条评论