首页 > 期刊杂志 > 正文

Gleason Grading, Biochemical Failure, and Prostate Cancer-Specific Death.

Gleason分级、生化失败和前列腺癌特异性死亡率

Abstract

To examine the relationship between the recently defined Gleason grade groups and prostate cancer-specific mortality.
If the probability of prostate cancer-specific death is symbolized as P(PSD), the probability of biochemical failure is symbolized as P(BF), and the probability of prostate cancer-specific death after biochemical failure is symbolized as P(PSD | BF), then the rules of probability provide a way to estimate P(PSD) as P(PSD) = P(PSD | BF) * P(BF) Using this model and data from the literature for P(PSD | BF) and P(BF), I estimate here values of P(PSD) for the five newly described Gleason grade groups.
The expected probability of prostate cancer- specific death is closely related to the new Gleason grade groups and ranges from a low of 0.014 for grade group 1 to a high of 0.15 for grade group 5.
Although using the original study patient population may require years of additional follow-up to examine prostate cancer-specific mortality, the evidence available now indicates that these new Gleason grade groups relate to prostate cancer-specific mortality.

摘要

本文探讨最近新定义的Gleason分级分组与前列腺癌死亡率之间的关系。如果前列腺癌死亡率表示为P(PSD),生化失败的概率表示为P(BF),生化失败后前列腺癌的死亡率表示为P(PSD | BF ),则概率规则提供了一种方法评估前列腺死亡率为P(PSD)= P(PSD | BF)* P(BF)。使用这个公式和文献中P(PSD | BF)和P (BF)的数据,我评估了这五个新描述的Gleason分级分组的P(PSD)值。结果显示前列腺癌的预期死亡概率与新Gleason分级分组密切相关,从1级的0.014至5级的0.15。尽管使用原始研究人群可能需要多年的额外随访来调查前列腺癌死亡率,但现有证据表明这些新的Gleason分级分组与前列腺癌死亡率有关。


full text

我要评论

0条评论