Abstract
Intranodal spindle cell lesions on biopsy are problematic for a surgical pathologist, often requiring an extensive immunohistochemical evaluation with variable and frequently unsatisfactory results. In the absence of a history of malignancy, the differential diagnosis of a spindle cell tumor must include both a primary nodal proliferation and a metastatic process. Particularly challenging are those lesions that share morphologic and immunohistochemical features; spindle cell melanomas (SCM) and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcomas (IDCS) belong to this category. At present, electron microscopy is the only method proposed to distinguish between the 2 entities; however, this method is often unavailable and impractical. In this study, we assessed the comparative immunophenotypes of 18 cases of SCM and 8 cases of IDCS, with particular emphasis on the expression of MUM-1, β-catenin, SOX-10, MiTF, and p75. Our results showed nearly equivalent staining patterns and profiles; 12% and 17% of IDCS and SCM were labeled for MUM-1, 75% and 83% stained for β-catenin, 0% and 24% expressed MiTF, and 100% and 94% labeled for p75, respectively. All cases of IDCS and SCM displayed strong nuclear reactivity for SOX-10. On the basis of our study and pertinent literature, the morphologic and immmunophenotypic features of SCM and IDCS appear to be virtually indistinguishable from one another, raising the question as to whether these 2 entities represent a pathobiologically similar or even identical process.
摘要
结内梭形细胞病变的活检对于外科病理学家是一个难题,通常需要做一组免疫组化评估,且表达结果常变化莫测、不如人意。在缺乏恶性病史的梭形细胞肿瘤,鉴别诊断必须包括淋巴结原发增殖性病变和结外转移。特别具有挑战性的是那些具有相同形态学和免疫组化特点的病变,梭形细胞黑色素瘤(SCM)和指状突树突细胞肉瘤(IDC)就属于这一类。
目前,电子显微镜是唯一能区分这两种实体瘤的方法;然而,这种方法往往难以进行或并不实用。
这项研究中,我们比较性地评估了18例SCM 和8例IDC的免疫表型,特别着重于MUM-1、β-catenin、SOX-10、MiTF和p75的表达。
我们的结果表明二者的染色模式和表达谱几乎相同:12%的 IDC、17%的SCM 表达MUM-1,75% 的IDC、83%的SCM表达β-catenin, 0%的 IDC、24%的SCM表达MiTF,p75 表达率则分别为100%和94%。所有IDC和SCM病例显示SOX-10核强阳性。在我们的研究和相关文献的基础上,SCM的形态学和免疫表型特征与IDC貌似几乎无法区分,由此产生一个问题:是否这两种实体瘤代表病理学上相似甚至相同的过程。
共0条评论