首页 > 期刊杂志 > 正文

Young investigator challenge: Atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid FNA: Standardized terminology without standardized management-a closer look at repeat FNA and quality measures.

年轻调查者的挑战:甲状腺FNA中不能明确意义的非典型性病例中,诊断术语标准化、但处理却没有标准-更进一步看重复FNA和质量控制方法

Brandler TC,Aziz MS,Coutsouvelis C,Rosen L,Rafael OC,Souza F,Jelloul FZ,Klein MA

Abstract

The Bethesda system (TBS) for the reporting of thyroid cytopathology established the category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) with a 7% target rate and a 5% to 15% implied malignancy risk. Recent literature has reported a broad range of AUS rates, subsequent malignancy rates, and discrepant results from repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus surgical follow-up. Therefore, this study examined AUS data from the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine to determine the best clinical follow-up.
Thyroid aspirates interpreted as AUS in 2012-2014 at the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine were collected. Repeat FNA and surgical follow-up data were tabulated to establish AUS, secondary AUS (diagnosed upon repeat FNA follow-up of a primary FNA AUS diagnosis), atypia of undetermined significance/malignancy (AUS:M) ratios (according to the TBS categories), and malignancy rates for AUS.
The AUS rate was 8.5% (976/11,481), and there was follow-up data for 545 cases. The AUS:M ratio was 2.0. Repeat FNA was performed for 281 cases; 57 proceeded to surgical intervention. Repeat FNA reclassified 71.17% of the cases. The malignancy rates for AUS cases proceeding directly to surgery and for those receiving a surgical intervention after a repeat AUS diagnosis were 33.33% and 43.75%, respectively.
Repeat FNA resulted in definitive diagnostic reclassification for 67.61% of primary AUS cases and reduced the number of patients triaged to surgery, with 56.58% of the cases recategorized as benign. Cases undergoing surgery after repeat AUS had a higher malignancy rate than those going straight to surgery, and this emphasizes the value of repeat FNA in selecting surgical candidates. In addition, this study highlights the utility of AUS rate monitoring as a quality measure that has contributed to the ability of the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine to adhere closely to TBS recommendations. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2016;124:37-43. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

摘要

甲状腺细胞病理学报告的TBS系统确立了不能明确意义的非典型性这一分类,占7%,其中5-15%提示恶性。最近的文献报道了AUS比例和继之确定的恶性比例范围均较广,重复细针穿刺(FNA)与外科随访的结果有差异。所以本次研究调查了Hofstra North Shore-LIJ 医学院的AUS数据,期望明确最佳临床随访方案。

收集Hofstra North Shore-LIJ 医学院2012-2014年甲状腺针吸判读为AUS的数据。将重复FNA和外科随访数据进行制表,确定AUS、第二次诊断AUS(在第一次FNA诊断为AUS后随访,第二次重复FNA再次诊断为AUS)、不能明确意义的非典型性/恶性比率(AUS:M)比率(根据TBS分类)和AUS中的恶性比率。

AUS的比率为8.5%(976/11481),545例有随访数据。AUS:M比率为2.0。281例进行了重复FNA;57例进行外科干预。重复FNA重新分类的病例数占71.17%。判读为AUS后直接手术的恶性率和重复AUS诊断后再接受外科干预的恶性率分别为33.33%和43.75%。

重复FNA导致了67.61%初次AUS的病例得到明确的诊断性重新分类,减少了分流到手术的病人数量,其中56.58%的病例重新分类为良性。重复的AUS后再进行手术的病例比那些直接进行手术的病例具有更高的恶性率,这强调了在选择外科病人中重复FNA的价值。另外,本次研究强调了使用AUS比率监控作为质量控制方法有助于Hofstra North Shore-LIJ 医学院紧严格遵守TBS分类的能力。

full text

我要评论

0条评论