首页 > 期刊杂志 > 正文

Prostate Biopsy Specimens With Gleason 3+3=6 and Intraductal Carcinoma: Radical Prostatectomy Findings and Clinical Outcomes.

前列腺活检标本中有Gleason评分3+3=6的前列腺癌及导管内癌:根治性前列腺切除术后的发现及临床预后

Abstract

Although intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is typically present on biopsies in which there is also invasive prostate carcinoma of Gleason pattern 4 or 5 and an associated unfavorable outcome, there are limited studies on IDC-P in needle core biopsies or transurethral resections (TURP) with only a concomitant low-grade invasive component. There are differing opinions on incorporating IDC-P into the Gleason score in such cases. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes and radical prostatectomy (RP) findings in patients with Gleason 3+3=6 and IDC-P on biopsy or TURP. We identified 73 patients in our consult files (2001 to 2014) who had IDC-P and Gleason score 6 carcinoma on biopsy or TURP with no invasive higher Gleason grade component. Clinical follow-up information was available in 62 patients. Treatment was RP in 14 patients, radiation therapy in 31 patients, androgen deprivation therapy in 1 patient, and cryotherapy in 1 patient. Four patients were found to have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and were treated with chemotherapy. Eleven patients underwent active surveillance after diagnosis, of which 6 were eventually treated for progressive disease. The 14 RP specimens were centrally reviewed, and 86% had extensive IDC-P present. The Gleason grades in these 14 RP cases were 3+3=6 in 21%, 3+4=7 in 36%, 4+3=7 in 29%, and 4+4=8 in 14%. Pathologic stage was pT2 in 36%, pT3a in 36%, and pT3b in 28%. After 3 years, there was a 20% actuarial rate of disease progression in men who underwent either RP or radiation therapy. In summary, most men with IDC-P on biopsy/TURP have aggressive tumors, even when the invasive tumor on biopsy is Gleason score 6. As a minority of men may only have Gleason 6 invasive cancer at RP and a favorable prognosis, we recommend that IDC-P on biopsy/TURP be reported separately and not assigned a Gleason score.

摘要

尽管前列腺导管内癌在前列腺癌组织活检中经常发现,其内也包括Gleason分数为4或5及与此相关的预后不良的浸润性前列腺癌。关于穿刺活检及经尿道前列腺切除标本中前列腺导管内癌仅伴有低级别浸润癌成分的研究非常有限。在这些病例中,将前列腺导管内癌纳入Gleason评分具有不同的观点。本研究的目的是探讨经活检或经尿道前列腺电切术后Gleason评分3+3=6的前列腺导管内癌患者的根治性前列腺切除后的新发现及临床预后。在我们查阅的资料中(2001年至2014年)确定了73位患者,均行穿刺活检或经尿道前列腺切除术,诊断为导管内癌和Gleason评分6分的癌,并且没有更高Gleason评分的浸润性成份。其中62例患者有临床随访信息。这些患者中14例行根治性前列腺切除术治疗,31例采用放射治疗,1例采用雄激素阻断疗法,1例采用冷冻疗法。4例在诊断的同时发现有转移性病变,并且采取化疗方案。11例在诊断以后进行积极监测,其中有6例因疾病进展而接受治疗。对这14例根治性前列腺切除的样本进行集中评估,86%的患者有前列腺导管内癌的表现。在这14例根治性前列腺切除的病例中Gleason评分3+3=6的占21%,3+4=7的占 36%,4+3=7 的占29%,4+4=8 的占 14%。病理分期为pT2 的占 36%,pT3a占 36%, pT3b 占 28%。三年以后,在经过根治性前列腺切除或者放射治疗的患者中,疾病发生进展的确切百分率为20%。总之,大部分经穿刺活检或者经尿道前列腺电切术导管内癌的患者伴有侵袭性肿瘤,即使活检中的侵袭性肿瘤为Gleason评分6分。因为有少数人在根治性前列腺切除时可能仅仅有Gleason评分为6的浸润性癌并且预后良好,所以我们建议穿刺活检或者经尿道前列腺电切中的导管内癌需要单独报告,而不应被纳入Gleason评分。


full text

我要评论

0条评论