首页 > 期刊杂志 > 正文

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma in the bone marrow: paratrabecular involvement as an important distinguishing feature.

骨髓中淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤及边缘区淋巴瘤:小梁旁浸润是重要的鉴别特征

Bassarova A,Trøen G,Spetalen S,Micci F,Tierens A,Delabie J

Abstract

The differential diagnosis between bone marrow involvement by lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is challenging because histology and immunophenotype of both diseases overlap. We revisited the diagnostic pathology features of both diseases in the bone marrow.
We studied a series of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens from 59 patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia without extramedullary involvement and bone marrow biopsy specimens from 23 patients with well-characterized MZL who also had bone marrow involvement. H&E- and immunoperoxidase-stained sections of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens as well as flow cytometry and classic cytogenetics performed on aspirations were reviewed. The study was complemented with MYD88 L265P mutation analysis of all samples.
The most distinguishing features of LPL with respect to MZL were focal paratrabecular involvement (P < .001), the presence of lymphoplasmacytoid cells (P < .001) and Dutcher bodies (P < .001), increased numbers of mast cells (P < .001), and the MYD88 L265P mutation (P < .001).
LPL can be reliably distinguished from MZL in the bone marrow by using a combination of pathology characteristics. Our findings stress the diagnostic importance of using the combination of the following parameters for a correct LPL diagnosis: paratrabecular infiltration, the presence of lymphoplasmacytoid cells and cells with Dutcher bodies, and an increased number of mast cells in addition to the presence of MYD88 mutation.

摘要

淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤(Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma ,LPL)及边缘区淋巴瘤( Marginal zone lymphoma ,MZL)骨髓侵犯的鉴别诊断是具有挑战性的,因为二者的组织学及免疫表型特征存在重叠。我们回顾了这两种疾病在骨髓中的病理诊断特点。

我们研究了一系列骨髓环钻活检标本,包括59例无髓外浸润的Waldenström巨球蛋白血症及23例伴有骨髓侵犯、具有明确特征的MZL。回顾分析了骨髓环钻活检标本的 H&E及免疫过氧化物酶染色切片,并在抽吸标本中复习了其流式细胞学及典型细胞遗传学。所有样本补充检测了MYD88 L265P突变情况。

相对于MZL,灶性小梁旁浸润 (P < .001)、出现淋巴浆样细胞 (P < .001)及Dutcher小体 (P < .001)、肥大细胞数量增多 (P < .001)以及MYD88 L265P突变 (P < .001)是LPL最明确的鉴别特征。

在骨髓中正确的区分LPL与MZL,依赖于综合病理学特点分析。我们的研究结果强调正确诊断LPL需要以下参数的联合应用分析:小梁旁浸润、出现淋巴浆样细胞及细胞中Dutcher小体、肥大细胞增多以及存在MYD88 L265P突变。

full text

我要评论

0条评论