Abstract
Numerous histological mimics of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus predispose to overdiagnosis and potential serious mismanagement, including unnecessary esophagectomy. This study investigates the prevalence and sources of this problem. Biopsies from 485 patients diagnosed with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia were screened for a multi-institutional, international Barrett's endoscopic ablation trial. Screening included review of the original diagnostic slides and an additional protocol endoscopy with an extensive biopsy sampling. Observer variability by the study pathologists was assessed through two blinded diagnostic rounds on 437 biopsies from 26 random study endoscopies. Study diagnostic reassessments revealed significantly lower rates of high-grade dysplasia. Only 248 patients (51%) were confirmed to have high-grade dysplasia. The remaining patients had inflamed gastric cardia without Barrett's (n=18; 7%), Barrett's without dysplasia (n=35; 15%), indefinite change (n=61; 26%), low-grade dysplasia (n=79; 33%), adenocarcinoma (n=43; 18%), and other (n=1; <1%), yielding an alarming total of 194 or 40% of patients who were overdiagnosed with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia. Study pathologists achieved a high-level agreement (90% three-way inter-observer agreement per biopsy, Kappa value 0.77) for high-grade dysplasia. Confounding factors promoting overdiagnosis included Barrett's inflammatory atypia (n=182), atypia limited to the basal metaplastic glands (n=147), imprecise criteria for low grade neoplasia (n=102), tangential sectioning artifact (n=59), and reactive gastric cardiac mucosa (n=38). A total of 194 patients (40%) were overdiagnosed with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia, as affirmed by the extensive screening process and high-level study pathologist agreement. The multiple diagnostic pitfalls uncovered should help raise pathologists' awareness of this problem and improve diagnostic accuracy.
摘要
Barrett食管许多病理组织学改变类似高度异型增生,容易导致大量过度诊断和潜在严重的错误治疗,包括不必要的食管切除手术。本研究就误诊几率和原因进行了探讨。筛选了485例诊断为Barrett食管伴高度异型增生的活检标本,用于多机构、国际性Barrett食管内镜消融试验。筛查内容包括复习原始诊断切片并签署内窥镜检查广泛活检取样的协议。对26个随机内镜研究中的437例活检标本进行两轮双盲诊断,评估病理医师诊断差异性。研究发现再次诊断高度异型增生比率明显降低。只有248例(51%)被证实有高度异型增生。其余病变包括贲门炎症无Barrett食管(n = 18;7%)、Barrett食管无异型增生(n = 35;15%)、无明确改变(n = 61;26%)、低度异型增生(n = 79;33%)、腺癌(n = 43;18%)和其他(n = 1;< 1%),共计194例或40%患者过度诊断为Barrett食管高度异型增生,这一数目是惊人的。对高度异型增生病理医生取得了高度一致性(每例活检达到了90%的三向诊断者之间一致性,Kappa值0.77)。容易引起过度诊断的迷惑因素包括Barrett食管炎性不典型性(n = 182)、局限于基底化生腺体的不典型性(n = 147)、低级别上皮内瘤变标准不精确(N = 102)、人为斜切(N = 59)和反应性贲门黏膜(n = 38)。共有194例(40%)患者过度诊断为Barrett食管高度异型增生,且经大量筛选程序证实并取得了上级病理医生的一致肯定。多个诊断陷阱的发现应该有助于提高病理医生警惕性并提升诊断的准确性。
共0条评论